Greg Thornton Charged for red syrup protest on Lion and Lamb Statue in front of Police Station

10 Jun

On Tuesday June 9th Thornton got a call from Det. Dan Copper of WRPS regarding the spilling of Fake Blood on the Lion and Lamb statue outside of Waterloo Regional Police Station in Waterloo April 7th. The Blood was spilt on the Statue and a Record article on the shooting of Beau Baker was put under the legs of the lion and lamb with the quote from Police Chief Brian Larkin encircled. The quote encircled was the word de-escalation.

Thornton was charged with Mischief under $5000 for this protest action against the murder of Beau Baker as a result of a two month investigation including the testimony of one Joseph Bornino. a classmate turned rat and informer despite the help that Thornton has given him to promote his music.

Despite having the resources two spend two months investigating and them charging someone for spilling a non staining substance on a statue the SIU have not yet ruled on the shooting of Beau Baker.

Those who want to come out to support Thornton can come to his first court hearing July 31st at 9 am in Courtroom 106

Advertisements

2 Responses to “Greg Thornton Charged for red syrup protest on Lion and Lamb Statue in front of Police Station”

  1. Authorized Representative June 15, 2015 at 12:43 am #

    NOTICE

    The words following this NOTICE are for entertainment purposes only.

    End of NOTICE.

    *****************************

    Is your lawyer claiming that you are HER MAJESTY AND AN ORGANIZATION? Because if you are being charged with a crime you must be HER MAJESTY AND AN ORGANIZATION.

    Look at the definition of PERSON in the Criminal Code of Canada if you doubt this. (Everything after the word “includes” is their definition of what a legal person is.)

    I hope your lawyer isn’t going to ATTORN you and claim/respond/act as if you are HER MAJESTY AND AN ORGANIZATION.

    FYI

    The police (WRP) are a company registered on the a US stock exchange. You don’t have to accept their OFFER to contract. You can return it DECLINED, unless you have already been ATTORNED by an ATTORNey who has given you over to a new landlord and put you smack dab in the middle of their admiralty/commercial JURISDICTION.

    BTW

    In order for a crime to be committed their must be a victim. You need to discover who is the victim and put them on the stand.

    This is crucial to understand…Who is a PARTY to these proceedings? I suspect (read this as I know), you are the only PARTY. Your lawyer isn’t a party, the crown’s lawyer is not a party, the Justice is not a party, and any police that testify are not a party.

    And who is the SURETY for the ALL CAPS name issued to you in the form of the Birth Certificate. Is your signature on that SURETY BOND? I suspect not. If it isn’t on that SURETY BOND (B.C.) then you are NOT the SURETY for these charges.

    You might want to deposit the SURETY BOND in the file and and when the FICTION in ALL CAPS is called, inform the court that it is the courts possession.

    You might also want to create an affidavit which remains the truth until rebutted clarifying some of the above truths.

    And you might want to attach the following to your affidavit and repeatedly ask the questions within it until all of them are answered:

    NOTICE OF MISTAKE

    In the matter of SURETY for the LEGAL NAME, I believe that there has been a
    MISTAKE as the SOLE BENEFICIARY has been INCORRECTLY IDENTIFIED as the
    accused. If I, AND/OR PERSONS AND/OR FRIENDS OF THE COURT AND/OR
    SUCH OTHER PARTIES ACTING IN MY INTERESTS, have led the COURT to believe
    by responding to “You” and or “GREGORY MICHAEL THORNTON” and/or SUCH OTHER
    IDENTIFICATION THIS COURT HAS ADDRESSED ME AS, that I am the PARTY
    WITH SURETY in this matter, then that would be a MISTAKE and please forgive
    me.

    As I have no knowledge of who “You” and or “GREGORY MICHAEL THORNTON” and/or SUCH
    OTHER IDENTIFICATION THIS COURT HAS ADDRESSED ME AS, I RESPECTFULLY
    ASK; by WHAT AUTHORITY is the COURT ADDRESSING me as such?
    As the SURETY BOND (BIRTH CERTIFICATE) has been deposited into the COURT,
    WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that I, as the SOLE BENEFICIARY of the
    TRUST have any SURETY in this matter?

    As the GOVERNMENT is the SOLE SIGNATORY PARTY on the SURETY BOND
    (BIRTH CERTIFICATE), with SOLE AND FULL SURETY as TRUSTEE for the LEGAL
    NAME, WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that I am a TRUSTEE for the
    LEGAL NAME. WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that I am a TRUSTEE and
    have ANY SURETY with respect to the LEGAL NAME?

    WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that I am an OFFICER, an AGENT, a
    TRUSTEE or an EMPLOYEE of the CROWN?

    WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have of any WARRANT OF AGENCY for the
    principal?

    WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that there has been any meeting of the
    minds, any PROPER NOTICE given, any considerable CONSIDERATION offered, or
    that I have ANY INTENT to CONTRACT in this matter?

    As such, I am returning your OFFER, DECLINED, for immediate DISCHARGE and
    CLOSURE.

    AUTHORISED BY:

    PS

    Or I could deposit you into a TRUST. 😉

    I trust you found this very entertaining.

  2. Harry Wombat August 5, 2015 at 9:36 pm #

    🙂

    Looks familiar.

    This NOTICE is extremely powerful,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: